This application describes the first web-based polytomous identification key for the genus Paratylenchus .
Here we developed a web-assisted method to achieve an easy and accurate morphometric Paratylenchus species
characterisation that would greatly improve identification of these small plant-parasitic nematodes
for many diagnostic laboratories.
We considered here only the Paratylenchus valid species according to the latest monograph of the genus
published by Ghaderi et al. (2016), as well as other Paratylenchus species populations based only on integrative
taxonomical identification and the posterior species described comprising a total of 140 nominal species
[Van den Berg et al., 2014; Subbotin et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2021; Clavero-Camacho et al. 2021a; 2021b].
This is because of the great cryptic diversity detected in the recent studies of pin nematodes [Van den Berg et al.,
2014; Subbotin et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2021; Clavero-Camacho et al. 2021a; 2021b], may alter the real morphometric
delimitations for each species. For that, we contemplated all the main diagnostic characters, comprising 11 numerical
and 13 categorical characters (Table 1). Selection for quantitative character division in subgroups within each
diagnostic numerical character was based on K-means clustering method [Jin and Han, 2011].
A) Female stylet length:
A1: < 23.5 µm
A2: 23.5-40.0 µm
A3: 40.1-69.5 µm
A4: > 69.5 µm
B) Excretory pore level:
B1: at median bulb level or anterior
B2: at isthmus level
B3: at basal bulb level or posterior
C) Number of lines in lateral field:
C1: 2 lines
C2: 3 lines
C3: 4 lines
C4: indistinct lines
D) Advulval flap:
D1: present
D2: absent
E) Lip region shape in lateral view:
E1: conoid
E2: rounded
E3: disc-shape
E4: truncate, concave, anteriorly flattened
E5: cap-like structure
F) Submedian lobes in lateral view:
F1: without submedian lobes
F2: with small submedian lobes
F3: with prominent submedian lobes
G) Vulva-anus distance:
G1: ≤ 32.75 µm
G2: 32.76-47.50 µm
G3: > 47.50 µm
H) Spermatheca shape:
H1: rounded to pherical
H2: elongated, oval
H3: not developed, inconspicuous
I) (Female stylet length/L) x 100:
I1: ≤ 12.20 %
I2: 12.21-21.8 %
I3: > 21.8 %
J) Male:
J1: unknown
J2: present
K) Male tail shape:
K1: conoid
K2: rounded, cylindrical
K3: filiform terminus
K4: unknown
L) Male stylet:
L1: unknown
L2: without stylet
L3: with stylet
M) c' ratio:
M1: ≤ 2.25
M2: 2.26-2.85
M3: 2.86-3.35
M4: 3.36-3.95
M5: > 3.95
N) b ratio:
N1: ≤ 2.85
N2: 2.86-3.65
N3: 3.66-4.25
N4: > 4.25
O) Body length (L):
O1: ≤ 253 µm
O2: 253-303 µm
O3: 304-356 µm
O4: 357-426 µm
O5: > 426 µm
P) Spicules length:
P1: ≤ 14.25 µm
P2: 14.26-16.75 µm
P3: 16.76-19.75 µm
P4: 19.76-23.0 µm
P5: > 23.0 µm
Q) Female tail terminus shape:
Q1: acute or pointed
Q2: subacute to finely rounded
Q3: bluntly rounded
Q4: digitate, lobed or indented
Q5: serrated
R) V ratio (%):
R1: ≤ 76.0 %
R2: 76.1-81.0 %
R3: > 81.0 %
S) Female tail length:
S1: ≤ 26.4 µm
S2: > 26.4 µm
T) J4 stylet:
T1: absent
T2: present
T3: unknown
U) c ratio:
U1: ≤ 13.25
U2: 13.26-17.25
U3: > 17.25
V) Female tail shape:
V1: conoid
V2: cylindrical
V3: subcylindrical, elongate
W) Cuticle annulation:
W1: normal annulation, ca. 1 µm
W2: cuticle with punctations
W3: cuticle annuli crenate
X) a ratio:
X1: ≤ 21.75
X2: > 21.7
REFERENCES
1. I. Clavero-Camacho, C. Cantalapiedra-Navarrete, A. Archidona-Yuste, P. Castillo,
and J. E. Palomares-Rius, "Remarkable cryptic diversity of Paratylenchus spp. (Nematoda: Tylenchulidae) in Spain," Animals
11, 1161, 2021a. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041161
2. I. Clavero-Camacho, J. E. Palomares-Rius, C. Cantalapiedra-Navarrete, et al., "Integrative
taxonomy reveals hidden cryptic diversity within pin nematodes of the genus Paratylenchus (Nematoda: Tylenchulidae)," Plants 10, 1454,
2021b. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071454
3. R. Ghaderi, L. Kashi, and A. Karegar, "Contribution to the study of the genus Paratylenchus Micoletzky,
1922 sensu lato (Nematoda: Tylenchulidae)," Zootaxa 3841, 151-187, 2014.
4. R. Ghaderi, E. Geraert, and A. Karegar,
"The Tylenchulidae of the world, identification of the Family Tylenchulidae (Nematoda: Tylenchida)," Academia Press: Ghent, Belgium, 453 pp., 2016.
5. X. Jin, and J. Han, "K -Means Clustering. In: Sammut C., Webb G.I. (eds)
Encyclopedia of Machine Learning ," Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 563-564, 2010. doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_425
6. P. R. Singh, G. Karssen, M. Couvreur, S.A. Subbotin, and W. Bert,
"Integrative taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of the plant-parasitic nematode genus Paratylenchus (Nematoda: Paratylenchinae):
linking species with molecular barcodes," Plants 10, 408, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10
7. S. A. Subbotin, G. Yan, M. Kantor, and Z. Handoo, "On the molecular identity of Paratylenchus
nanus Cobb, 1923 (Nematoda: Tylenchida)," Journal of Nematology 52 , e2020-127, 2020. 10.21307/jofnem-2020-127
8. E. Van den Berg, L. R. Tiedt, and S. A. Subbotin, "Morphological and molecular characterisation
of several Paratylenchus Micoletzky, 1922 (Tylenchida: Paratylenchidae) species from South Africa and USA, together with some
taxonomic notes," Nematology 16, 323-358, 2014.
For better information on using XPER3 , see the following video.
VIDEO